|
Biotechnology
Australia’s life skills
| Snapshot: Australian biotechnology
INDUSTRY FEATURES
o R&D base:
o biomedical, agriculture
o Infrastructure:
o biotech clusters, mature allied industries
o Natural resources:
o island continent endemicity;
o disease-free domestic stock
o Cost-effective:
o highly-educated skills at relatively low cost
o Quality of life:
o highly rated in international comparisons
o Industry assistance:
o aggressive government programs
o Regulatory environment:
o harmonious IP protection
o Investment opportunities:
o robust economic growth
o Regional hub:
o leader in the Asia-Pacific region
o Community awareness:
o open public debate
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
o Stem cells
o Proteomics
o Genomics: plant, human
o Animal health
o Plant protection
o Bioprospecting
o Bioprocessing
o Combinatorial chemistry
o Drug discovery
o Drug delivery
o Diagnostics; immunotechnology
o Clinical trials
o Medical devices
o GMP facilities
o Bioremediation
o Biological control
o Animal reproduction
o Neuroscience
o Plant propagation
o Biosensing
o Food production; dairy |
Small companies rich in intellectual property dominate
Australian biotechnology. The industry has shown double-digit growth for
the past decade, on the back of increased capital investment (local and
foreign), patents, company start-ups, IPOs and international partnerships.
As a consequence of the global stalling of VC funds,
the value of many Australian biotechnology companies fell for the first
time last year. But the contraction of funding opportunities has led to
a period of consolidation, and the industry is now geared to move forward
more robustly than ever before.
Support for the industry
Uniformly, Australia’s federal and state governments have targeted
biotechnology as a key to economic growth. State governments have established
technology clusters to foster local interactions, and to act as a springboard
into the global industry.
Public schemes – BIF (pre-seed), IIF Fund (venture
capital), R&D tax credits for SMEs, COMET (early-stage commercialisation)
– support the fledgling industry. There have been amendments to
pooled development funds, changes to the capital gains tax provisions,
amendments to international double-tax treaties, and support of national
Centres of Excellence. State governments actively recruit global partners
and compete for investment opportunities.
The national Office of the Gene Technology Regulator has
established a clear regulatory framework for the biotechnology industry,
and has established linkages with Intellectual Property Australia, the
Therapeutics Goods Administration, Biotechnology Australia, and AQIS (the
Australian Quarantine Inspection Service).
Public-private cooperation
The borders between public and private biotechnology are
increasingly blurred in Australia. With recent developments such as the
Centres of Excellence in Stem Cells and Integrative Legume Research, the
Major National Research Facilities (MNRFs), the Institute of Molecular
Biology, and Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs), in each case there has
been crucial collaboration between private enterprise and public institutions.
More sophisticated commercial activities have accelerated the growth of
the industry. Increasingly, the public sector is encouraged to commercialise
its intellectual property. Last year, 49 spin-off companies emerged from
Australia’s universities, the CSIRO, and medical research institutes.
More than a third of these spin-offs were biotechnology-based.
Australian biotechnology companies employ about 6000 people,
and have a market capitalisation around A$15bn. The allied pharmaceutical
industry has an annual turnover of A$4bn, generates an annual A$900m in
exports, spends A$160m in R&D expenditure, and employs 14,000 people.
Competing
internationally
Australians succeed in competitive international arenas like the Olympics,
the Academy Awards and Nobel prizes in medicine. In biotechnology, dollar
for dollar, person for person, company for company, Australians offer
innovation and value second to none. There is something about the mix
of life sciences and Australian culture that makes for a productive union.
The strength of Australian biotechnology lies in its human
capital. Australia produces a high proportion of life science graduates
when compared with competing nations. The industry is built largely on
the output of publicly-funded R&D including universities, medical
institutes, the CSIRO, and CRCs.
Australia’s natural resources are another core asset.
Australia is one of 17 megadiverse countries with high levels (more than
80%) of endemism. The antiquity of Australia’s separation from other
landmasses increases the chances of harbouring unique natural compounds,
the so-called new chemical entities (NCEs). Cerylid, a bioprospecting
company, has identified an NCE with novel anti-cancer activity, for example.
NCEs isolated from other regions tend to belong to the less profitable
‘me-too’ class of compounds.
Australia shares time zones with some notable growth economies.
Many Asian governments are committed to biotechnology, yet they lack the
R&D backbone that Australia enjoys. With its solid core, Australia
is the biotechnology leader of the Asia-Pacific rim (excluding North America).
Australian expertise in environ-mental management blends
with biotechnology. The expertise covers degraded land and water resources,
stretched over vast tracts of soil types and climates.
Ongoing community debate plays an active role in the development
of the Australian industry. Australians are somewhat more open-minded
than their EU counterparts, yet less accepting than Americans. At present,
there is heightened uncertainty about the value of GM foods, with widespread
acceptance of biotechnology in human and animal health.
A
global enterprise
By necessity, Australian biotechnology is a global enterprise –
the local market is not large enough to sustain the industry’s development.
Rich in IP, Australian companies have learnt to leverage their know-how
around the world.
A few Australian companies (CSL, Cochlear, ResMed) are global
entities in their own right. Others, like Proteome Systems, have established
a global presence through an array of strategic alliances. But most Australian
biotechnology companies are small, and have limited access to funds and
commercial expertise. They require international partners to prosper.
Mutually-beneficial partnerships are the hallmark of Australian
biotechnology. Partnerships, in this regard, are defined in the broadest
commercial terms. In a risky business, fraught with long lead times and
high rates of cash burn, innovative commercial deals are as important
as innovative technology.
Outsourcing and globalisation are two global progressions
that serve Australian biotechnology companies well. While local, innovative
companies generate novel commercial leads, they rely on the prowess of
multinationals to broach the global market.
The business opportunities listed in the panel on p67 bear
more on quality than quantity. In the business of biotechnology, clear
agreements to specific matches are critical to commercial success. Though
many and varied, partnerships with Australian biotechnology are incorporated
under the themes of:
- innovation;
- quality;
- value;
- commitment;
- complementarity; and
- global utility.
Websites:
www.biotechnology.gov.au
www.biotechnologydirectory.com.au
www.austrade.gov.au
www.investaustralia.gov.au
Pictures: CSIRO Science Image Online
|