| |
Anything, Anywhere
Asia-Pacific shipagents are having to expand both their
geographical presence and their package of services
Being a shipagent is about being where your principals
need you to be, and doing the job that they need you to do. Shipping,
though, is a flexible beast, so agents need to be equally flexible in
terms of location and of service provision. A look at the shipagency sector
in the Asia-Pacific region reveals examples of both.
New networks
The shipping landscape – or seascape – is changing in the
Asia-Pacific region. New ports are sniping at established neighbours (Tanjung
Pelepas is siphoning off business from Singapore, for instance), while
new regional hubs are developing, Shanghai being the most notable. Shipagents
in the region are having to show their principals that they are nimble
and swift on their feet, capable of providing an extensive service in
these new locations. The answer, in many cases, has been for shipagents
to expand their networks of offices and representatives. Large shipping
service providers such as Barwil and Wallem, for example, have a slate
of new offices either recently opened or soon to do so.
“Barwil continues to develop its presence in China,
and in 2002 we acquired a new office close to the Bund in Shanghai,”
says Nigel Moore, Barwil’s Senior Vice President Asia. “To
us, and hopefully our customers, this signals a firm commitment to be
in China for the long haul.”
According to Wallem’s Neil Russell, “In 2003
we expect to have established ourselves in Indonesia and Malaysia, and
to have repositioned ourselves in China following changes in regulations
governing foreign agency companies as a result of China joining the WTO.”
Global maritime service provider Inchcape Shipping Services
(ISS) says that, as far as China goes, it already has a presence in the
shape of port captains in Shanghai, Dalian, Tianjin, Qiandao and Guanzhou,
underlining the increasingly significant role that China is likely to
play in the region’s maritime industry in the decades ahead.
| Special agents
The face of shipagency has changed significantly over the years.
Agents have had to supplement their traditional income streams with
new income generators. In some cases, the services on offer seem
far removed from agency. A good example is Inchcape Shipping Services
(ISS)’ involvement with the HMS Nottingham, a Royal Navy ship
that ran onto a well-charted rock some 200 miles east of Sydney,
Australia, in July 2002.
The
UK’s Minister of Defence salvaged the vessel without the aid
of traditional salvage contractors. Instead, it employed ISS, which
says it has a long history of supporting the MoD’s surface
fleet vessels and associated agency functions – including
salvage operations.
All the support items, such as welding equipment,
provisions and material supplies, were sourced by ISS. According
to ISS, “If a salvage contractor had been involved, this service
would have been provided with the use of a large support team. Here,
the experience was already in place.” ISS salvage experience
includes the managing of the movement of a submarine remote operating
vessel into place in the attempt to recover crew from the sunken
Russian submarine Kursk in 2000.
The HMS Nottingham salvage was successful and the
ship was returned to the UK on a heavy-lift vessel towards the end
of 2002. |
Meanwhile, GAC, another global shipping services operator,
says it has 73 offices in the Asia Pacific and Indian sub-continent, with
more on the cards.
“Other locations are under review. Our expansion
will continue,” confirms Christer Sjoedoff, GAC’s Regional
Director.
But expansive regional networks are not commercial routes
open to everyone. Is the clock running down for small shipagents in the
region who are not able to keep up? Not necessarily, according to ISS.
“Our view is that small agencies will not disappear,”
the company says. “There is a trend for larger owners to go to global
players that are able to offer the innovative new products... but there
are many owners who are happy with their existing arrangements.”
 |
| Increased security in ports including
Singapore is adding to the workload of agents |
Heightened security
Not only are increasing demands being made on agents in terms of location,
they are increasingly being asked to do more, often in response to external
factors. One issue that agents in the Asia-Pacific region have had to
address recently has been that of security. The problem is two-fold. Firstly,
there have been heightened security requirements following the attacks
on New York and Washington in September 2001. Secondly, there is the persistent
problem of piracy in the region.
The container trades in particular have been affected by tighter regulation,
says Neil Russell. And not everyone has been equally active in responding
to the new regime.
“The increased emphasis on security has mainly been
felt through the implementation of the US Customs Service Container Security
Initiative,” he says. “This went live on 2 December 2002,
and we have had to change our work patterns to provide for more out-of-normal-office-hours
work. We are coping, but so far it appears that the cargo community has
not fully come to terms with the changes in trade documentation processes
which are necessary.”
The terrorist strikes against the US have also resulted
in stricter personnel regimes throughout the region, especially in Singapore,
says ISS.
“Authorities have made responsible enhancements to
security post-9/11,” it says. “For example, in Singapore there
has been significant tightening of regulations relating to the transfer
of crew, crew coming ashore, and passengers on cruiseships coming ashore
– such as face-to-face clearance. This inevitably has meant additional
work for the agent, as more time is spent dealing with immigration control.
This particularly impacts bunker calls, where the crew can no longer so
easily come ashore for R&R.”
For the agents, it’s a question of rolling with the
punches. Heightened requirements always mean more work. But agents in
the region have endeavoured to keep disruption to a minimum.
“We have seen no disruptions to business caused by the increased
emphasis on security,” says GAC’s Christer Sjoedoff.
Nigel Moore of Barwil agrees, though highlights the increased
costs involved.
“The authorities have generally tightened up, particularly
in immigration matters or work associated with the petroleum industry.
We no longer have quite the latitude to operate that we had, and activities
are more tightly regulated. No bad thing, but it all adds to the time
spent on performing agency tasks, and hence our costs increase also,”
he says.
The second security concern, piracy, has less of an impact
on them, the shipagents say. According to ISS, “Piracy is a key
issue for owners, but the impact on agents is not so significant. We do
provide information to vessels of how and to whom to report piracy and
sea robbery incidents – for example the Singapore Coast Guard, and
the Indonesia Marine Police, and the International Maritime Bureau in
KL. We also proactively alert principal clients to current events and
incidents as part of our service.”
Wallem’s Neil Russell confirms that piracy is more
of an issue for owners than agents.
“Piracy in the region is not a problem which normally
has a direct effect on agents,” he says.
Economic outlook
What is a concern for both owners and agents is the economic health of
the Asia-Pacific region. When Asia is buzzing, good business can be done.
When it isn’t, shipping tends to suffer, though container trades
can benefit on the outward trades, with Europe and the US able to buy
the region’s cheap exports. However, most container carriers run
their own Asia-Pacific agency operations, so the vagaries of the box sector
have comparatively little impact on the independents, who concentrate
on the dry bulk, oil and project cargo sectors. What, though, is the general
economic state of play at present and what is the outlook for agents?
“We are very busy,” says Wallem’s Neil
Russell. “Business has picked up strongly in the second half of
the year and we are hopeful of more of the same next year. But the Middle
East situation is of continuing concern and the sooner the short-term
issues are resolved the better.
“The US economy is not yet on a strong growth curve,
but there is more reason for optimism than pessimism. The regional economies
are not yet growing across the board, and of greatest concern is Japan,
which seems no longer capable of progressing further than short periods
of modest GDP growth. Hong Kong is hindered by its currency, which is
pegged to the US dollar, which is mainly why we are into the fifth year
of deflation in Hong Kong, and muddled ideas about how to interact with
a resurgent China, which goes from strength to strength and is the brightest
economic prospect in sight. For the [latter] alone, though, we can be
optimistic,” says Neil Russell.
Singapore and China calls up
ISS confirms that optimism. “In the Asia-Pacific region (excluding
Japan and Australia), ship calls are up 24% on last year. There is major
growth in Singapore due largely to new business from Stolt Nielsen, and
in China, which is in turn due to increased economic activity.”
It looks, then, as if principals will be keeping their
agents busy across the region during 2003.
Author: Roger Overall.
|
|